I’ve been interested in the Shroud of Turin, the shroud that many believe shows the image of Jesus Christ, for many many years. I can’t quite remember when I first leaned about it, but I’ve been a follower of news events and a somewhat amateur armchair historian ever since. I remember the first time I ever laid eyes on pictures of the shroud, and the sense of awe and wonder that filled me. At the time I first laid eyes on it, I was a believer, but I was not a Christian. The very existence of the shroud is very compelling and over the years, there has been a lot of talk, research, analysis and debate on if the shroud is real or a forgery. In fact, there are claims that it is the most studied object in history. Whether that is true or not, I couldn’t say.
I’m not going to try and convince you, the reader, that the shroud is real or fake. That’s not my place. Firstly, I’m a firm believer in historical objects, as well as science.
At the present time, science has presented the shroud as a fake, that was somehow created in the middle ages. How it was made is an answer that science can not answer, and a lot of smart people have tried. A lot of smart people have also tried to refute the statement that it’s a fake, and their arguments are compelling and in my opinion, have merit. The fact remains, however, that the final truth has not been found and it’s quite possible it never will be.
So, what exactly is the Shroud of Turin?
It’s a linen cloth, that was used to wrap a dead body, that somehow bears the 3 dimensional image of the man it covered. Front and back.
There is evidence that shows that the man was crucified.
There is evidence of blood on the shroud from piercings from the crucifixion.
There is evidence that suggests wounds that can seemingly only be explained by a crown of thorns.
This is a picture of the shroud itself. If you look closely, despite it’s small size, you can just make out the faint image of a man in the cloth.
So what’s all the hub-bub, bub?
So what makes the shroud so important, and please understand, it is very important. The fact is, if this is in fact the shroud that covered the body of Jesus, then it makes it one of the most important historical treasures of all time. If it’s real, and in fact the shroud that covered Jesus, we would know exactly what he looked like, as well as having historical evidence of his existence, and the Gospel stories of his death.
The following is a negative image of the face on the shroud, that allows you to get a clear image of what the person looked like.
The light colored places on the forehead is blood.
Some Historical Information on the Shroud
So how did the shroud come to light? How was it found? Who found it and why has it been suggested to be THE shroud?
I won’t go into the full historical chart for the shroud. If you are interested, you can visit here to see for yourself.
On April 10 or 16th, in the year 1349, a French Knight by the name of Geoffrey de Charny writes the pope with his intention the build a church and it is said he was already in possession of the shroud. Supposedly he picked it up in Constantinople.
30 years later, the first “showing” of the shroud takes place.
After that, there is along history of the shroud being moved around and displayed.
It is suggested that there is evidence of additional historical data on the shroud has been discovered.
There is evidence that the cloth, now called the Shroud of Turin, really was a treasure of the early church; not the Pauline communities with which we are so familiar, but the Church in the East. Edessa, in the Fertile Crescent of the upper Mesopotamia, between the Tigris and the Euphrates, was a major city on the Silk Road and undoubtedly one of the earliest Christian communities. If you traveled from Jerusalem to Antioch, you were two thirds of the way to Edessa. Turn left to go to Tarsus, turn right for Edessa. There is some evidence and a strong tradition that Thomas and Thaddeus Jude (Thaddeus of the 70, Thaddeus of Edessa) went to Edessa as early as 33 CE. There is a legend that they carried with them a cloth bearing an image of Jesus. In 544 CE, a cloth, with an image believed to be Jesus, was found above one of Edessa’s gates in the walls of the city, a cloth that Gregory Referendarius of Constantinople would later describe with a full length image and bloodstains. There is strong evidence that the Edessa cloth is in fact the Shroud of Turin.
Now the shroud is a relic of the Catholic Church, who will neither confirm or deny it’s belief on if the shroud is in fact real. It’s home is currently in Turin, Italy.
Science weighs in
Of course, when you have a historical object, the first thing that happens is scientists want to examine it and verify it’s authenticity. Apparently, a number of attempts have been made to examine the shroud by historians and scientists, when the Catholic Church permits. That doesn’t happen often. So what were the conclusions? Carbon 14 dating, a method used to date objects, was finally performed and the results came back showing an age of the middle ages. If this testing is accurate, then the shroud is not real. However, there are fierce defenders and scientists who claim the carbon 14 dating was not performed correctly. How? Because of where the sample was taken from, as well as the high possibility of foreign material embedded in the cloth giving false results. Long story short, someone once tried to burn the shroud and it has been suggested the sample used for the testing came from a repaired section of the shroud. There is evidence, in fact, that the shroud has been “repaired” a number of times over it’s history. Experts in science, paints, photography, and other copying methods have examined the shroud and can not explain how the image was made.
Believers weigh in
Believers in the shroud, the ones who are totally convinced that the shroud is the one used to cover Jesus, dismiss the scientists claims that it is a fake. We are talking fierce debates here. To the believers, the shroud is real and that is that and the fact that science hasn’t been able to explain everything about the shroud, as well as the possibility of mistakes in testing, have only fueled the debates, and their belief.
So what is my take on it?
I won’t give an opinion either way, though I do in fact have one. I will let you decide for yourself. What I find so interesting is that there are two factions of experts, scientists and lay people coming at the shroud from two directions.
One direction is the faction that seems to find it necessary to prove beyond a shadow of doubt that the shroud is fake.
The other direction is the same type of people who find the need to prove that it is real.
They can’t agree on anything. They can’t agree on testing methods, of results, of this and that. It really has muddied progress in my opinion.
But as usual, what I want to focus on is the group that wants to prove it false. There are scientist out there who are Christians, but it seems that the only ones whose voices are heard are the ones who are not. I just don’t, for the life of me, why there exists so many that find the need to prove that Jesus wasn’t real, that he was a story, or wasn’t the Son of God. They are the ones who want to show you that God doesn’t exist. That life has no meaning, that the teaching of Christ, although nice, aren’t worth the paper they have been recorded on. They are the ones who insist that happiness can only be found in what you do, selfish acts for yourself. Harsh? Maybe, but if the shoe fits…… I realize that not all of those who don’t believe the shroud is fake fits into this category. I just find it frustrating.
So what is the harm? Even if the shroud is fake, I can see no harm in the way people view it. As long as they are not idolizing it of course. To me, looking at the shroud is like looking at a cross. It serves as a representation of our faith in Jesus Christ, just like the cross. Where is the harm in that? This is why the Catholic Church refuses to weigh in on the matter. I happen to agree with this stance right now. Maybe one day, science will give us all the answers, but as of right now they can’t even come close and I’m not just talking about the shroud.
To those of you who want to laugh and scoff at the existence of Jesus and of God and that Jesus was His Son, then I find your lack of belief a little sad. Why? Because to you, there is nothing to look forward to, no ultimate hope, no ultimate goal. To you, life is just an existence. To me, that is not living.
For information on the Shroud of Turin, visit the official website: The Shroud of Turin
Of course, any mistakes in this post are my own.
~ Kev
